Well ... Da!

I've just been down at the University of Notre Dame (pronounced Noter Daym) in Fremantle, listening to an art historian debunk The Da Vinci Code.

Why is it that when a cop tells us Snake was seen exiting Westpac in a balaclava and brandishing a smoking sawnoff, and so is the chief suspect, we reply, "that's just circumstantial bullcrap".

But when a left-leaning art historian tells us Leonardo Da Vinci was more than likely gay because he never married, there was no evidence he had female friends, he was accused of sodomy twice, and left all his worldy posessions to a bloke, we say: "Oh, how true, how true"?