A blog of grumpiness, stilts and skin.

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Well ... Da!

I've just been down at the University of Notre Dame (pronounced Noter Daym) in Fremantle, listening to an art historian debunk The Da Vinci Code.

Why is it that when a cop tells us Snake was seen exiting Westpac in a balaclava and brandishing a smoking sawnoff, and so is the chief suspect, we reply, "that's just circumstantial bullcrap".

But when a left-leaning art historian tells us Leonardo Da Vinci was more than likely gay because he never married, there was no evidence he had female friends, he was accused of sodomy twice, and left all his worldy posessions to a bloke, we say: "Oh, how true, how true"?

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's because "snake"is only a character in a cartoon, but Da Vinci is a a character in an actual novel, and therefore more realistic.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

 
Blogger Grump Les Tiltskin said...

Crikey. Two comments in two days.

Seems this blog is going through a Renaissance of its own.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home